What You Need to Know Before Facing a Microsoft Software License Audit 

As businesses increasingly rely on digital solutions, software compliance has become a critical component of operational integrity. Organizations that implement Microsoft products must ensure they are prepared for a Microsoft software license audit. These audits are designed to ensure that organizations are adhering to their Microsoft license agreements. While they may seem routine, they can quickly become disruptive if your company isn’t prepared.  

A Microsoft software audit can uncover gaps in your software usage reporting, expose inconsistencies in cloud software licensing, and highlight procurement strategies that may not align with compliance standards. Without a clear understanding of audit procedures and licensing terms, businesses risk financial penalties, reputational damage, and operational setbacks.  

This guide is designed to help organizations navigate the complexities of Microsoft software license audits with confidence. Whether you’re a small business or a large enterprise, understanding the audit process from initial notification to final resolution is essential. We’ll explore key concepts like compliance audit procedures, software procurement strategy, and how to communicate effectively with Microsoft auditors.  

By the end of this article, you’ll be equipped with actionable insights to prepare for an audit, avoid common pitfalls, and develop a proactive strategy that supports long-term compliance.  

Understanding Microsoft Software Audits 

In today’s compliance-driven business environment, software audits are a reality that organizations must be prepared to face. For companies using Microsoft products, a Microsoft software license audit is one of the most common and potentially disruptive events. These audits are designed to verify that your organization is using Microsoft software in accordance with its license agreements. While they may seem routine, they can quickly become complex and costly if your business isn’t properly prepared.  

What Is a Microsoft Software License Audit? 

A Microsoft software license audit is a formal review conducted by Microsoft or a third-party auditor to assess whether your organization is compliant with its licensing terms. These audits typically focus on the software deployed across your network, how it’s being used, and whether the usage aligns with the entitlements granted under your Microsoft license agreements.  

There are several types of audits that Microsoft may initiate: 

Self-Audit: Microsoft may request that your organization conduct an internal review and submit findings. 

Software Asset Management (SAM) Engagement: A collaborative review where Microsoft helps your organization assess and improve software compliance.  

Formal Audit: A more rigorous and potentially legal process where Microsoft or its representatives conduct a full-scale audit of your software environment.  

Regardless of the type, the goal remains the same: to ensure that your organization is not under-licensed or over-licensed, and that all software usage is properly documented and authorized.  

Why Does Microsoft Conduct Audits? 

Microsoft conducts audits for several reasons, all of which are tied to protecting its intellectual property and ensuring fair use of its products. Audits help Microsoft ensure compliance with licensing agreements, prevent software piracy and unauthorized usage, identify opportunities for upselling or contract adjustments, and maintain accurate records of software deployment across its customer base.  

From a business perspective, audits also serve as a way for Microsoft to validate the effectiveness of its licensing models and identify gaps in customer understanding. As cloud software licensing becomes more prevalent, the complexity of managing entitlements across hybrid environments has increased, making audits a necessary tool for maintaining control.  

Key Terms and Concepts: 

To navigate a Microsoft software audit effectively, it’s important to understand the terminology commonly used throughout the process. Here are some key concepts to familiarize yourself with:  

Microsoft License Agreements: These are the contracts that define how your organization can use Microsoft software. Common agreements include the Enterprise Agreement (EA), Microsoft Products and Services (MPSA), and Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) contracts. 

True-Up Process: A periodic review where organizations report changes in software usage and adjust their licensing accordingly. This is often part of an EA and helps maintain compliance over time.  

Software Asset Management (SAM): A set of best practices and tools used to manage software licenses, usage, and compliance. SAM engagements are often collaborative and aim to improve your organization’s licensing posture.  

License Mobility: A feature that allows certain Microsoft licenses to be moved between on-prem and cloud environments. Understanding license mobility is crucial for organizations operating in hybrid or multi-cloud setups. 

Compliance Audit Procedures: These are the formal steps taken during an audit to assess your organization’s adherence to licensing terms. They include data collection, analysis, reporting, and resolution. 

Software Usage Reporting: The process of tracking and documenting how software is used across your organization. Accurate reporting is essential for demonstrating compliance and avoiding penalties. 

Cloud Software Licensing: Licensing models that apply to Microsoft cloud products like Azure, Microsoft 365, and Dynamics. These models often differ from traditional on-prem licensing and require careful management.  

Common Triggers for a Microsoft Audit: 

Microsoft may initiate an audit for several reasons. Some common triggers include: 

• Inconsistent usage data was reported during the true-up process 

• Rapid growth or expansion of your organization 

• Mergers and acquisitions that change your licensing needs 

• Suspicious activity or anomalies in software deployment 

• Customer complaints or whistleblower reports 

While some audits are random, others are targeted based on risk factors. Understanding what might trigger an audit can help your organization stay ahead of potential issues.  

The Role of Microsoft Auditors: 

During an audit, Microsoft may assign internal auditors or engage third-party firms to conduct the review. These auditors will request access to your software inventory, licensing documentation, and usage reports. They may also conduct interviews with IT personnel and review procurement records. 

It’s important to maintain open and professional communication with auditors. Designate a point of contact within your organization to manage the audit process and ensure that all requests are handled promptly and accurately.  

Risks of Non-Compliance: 

Failing a Microsoft software license audit can have serious consequences. These may include: 

• Financial penalties for unlicensed software usage 

• Mandatory purchases to correct licensing shortfalls 

• Legal action in cases of severe non-compliance 

• Damage to reputation and vendor relationships 

Even if your organization is compliant, poor documentation or inaccurate reporting can lead to findings that require remediation. That’s why proactive preparation and ongoing license management are essential.  

Benefits of Proactive Audit Readiness: 

While audits can be stressful, they also present an opportunity to improve your organization’s software management practices. By preparing in advance, you can: 

• Identify and resolve compliance gaps before they become issues 

• Optimize your software procurement strategy 

• Improve visibility into software usage 

• Strengthen vendor relationships through transparency and trust 

Audit readiness also supports broader business goals, such as cost control, operational efficiency, and risk mitigation. It ensures that your organization is not only compliant but also strategically aligned with its software investments.  

Compliance Audit Procedures 

Facing a Microsoft software license audit can be daunting, especially if your organization isn’t familiar with the compliance audit procedures involved. These procedures are designed to assess whether your company is using Microsoft software in accordance with its license agreements. Understanding the steps and importance of this process is essential for maintaining compliance, avoiding penalties, and ensuring your software environment is properly managed.  

A compliance audit is a formal review of your organization’s software usage, licensing documentation, and procurement records. The goal is to verify that all Microsoft software deployed across your network is properly licensed and used within the terms of your agreements. These audits are not just about checking boxes—they’re about protecting your business from legal and financial risks.  

Non-compliance can result in hefty fines, mandatory purchases, and reputational damage. Even if your organization believes it is compliant, poor documentation or misinterpretation of licensing terms can lead to findings that require remediation. That’s why understanding the audit process and preparing proactively is critical.  

Compliance audits also serve as a valuable opportunity to improve internal processes. They highlight gaps in software usage reporting, uncover inefficiencies in procurement strategy, and help align your licensing practices with business goals. By treating audits as a strategic exercise rather than a reactive event, your organization can strengthen its overall software management posture.  

Steps in the Compliance Audit Process: 

Microsoft software audits typically follow a structured process. While the exact steps may vary depending on the type of audit, the general flow includes the following phases: 

1. Notification and Scope Definition 

The audit process begins with a formal notification from Microsoft or its designated auditor. This communication outlines the scope of the audit, including which products, departments, or systems will be reviewed. It may also specify the timeframe for the audit and the types of data required. 

At this stage, it’s important to designate a point of contact within your organization to manage communications and coordinate internal efforts. This person should be familiar with your Microsoft license agreements and have access to relevant documentation and systems. 

2. Data Collection and Inventory 

Once the scope is defined, auditors will request detailed information about your software environment. This includes: 

Your organization may be asked to run specific tools, such as the Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit (MAP) or System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM), to generate usage reports. These tools help auditors understand how software is being used and whether it aligns with your entitlements. 

Accuracy is key during this phase. Incomplete or outdated data can lead to incorrect findings and unnecessary remediation. Make sure your inventory is up to date and that all documentation is organized and accessible.  

3. Review and Analysis 

After collecting the data, auditors will analyze your software usage against your license entitlements. They’ll look for discrepancies such as over-deployment of software beyond licensed quantities, use of software features not covered by your agreements, and misuse of cloud entitlements or license mobility rights.  

Auditors may also assess your software procurement strategy to determine whether it supports compliance. For example, decentralized purchasing or a lack of standardization can lead to licensing gaps and inefficiencies.  

During this phase, auditors may request clarification or additional documentation. Be prepared to respond promptly and provide supporting evidence where needed. 

4. Preliminary Findings and Response 

Once the analysis is complete, auditors will present preliminary findings. This report outlines any areas of non-compliance, potential risks, and recommended actions. Your organization will have an opportunity to review the findings and respond. 

It’s important to approach this phase collaboratively. If you believe a finding is inaccurate, provide documentation and context to support your position. Auditors are generally open to discussion and will revise findings if valid evidence is presented. 

This is also a good time to consult with legal or licensing experts to ensure your response is thorough and accurate. Addressing findings proactively can help minimize penalties and demonstrate your commitment to compliance.  

5. Final Report and Resolution 

After reviewing your response, auditors will issue a final report. This document confirms the audit outcome and outlines any required actions, such as purchasing additional licenses or implementing corrective measures.  

If your organization is found to be non-compliant, Microsoft may require you to true-up your licensing or pay penalties. In some cases, you may be offered a grace period to resolve issues without financial consequences.  

Once the audit is resolved, take time to review the process and identify areas for improvement. Consider implementing a SAM program to maintain ongoing compliance and prepare for future audits.  

Best Practices for Navigating Compliance Audits: 

To ensure a smooth audit experience, consider the following best practices: 

• Centralize software procurement to maintain control and consistency. 

• Maintain accurate and up-to-date documentation of all licenses and purchases. 

• Use automated tools for software usage reporting and inventory management. 

• Train internal teams on licensing terms and compliance requirements. 

• Engage with Microsoft proactively to clarify licensing questions and avoid misunderstandings. 

By following these practices, your organization can reduce the risk of non-compliance and build a strong foundation that encourages audit readiness.  

Preparing for a Microsoft Software Audit 

Preparing for a Microsoft software license audit is about building a proactive strategy that protects your business from risk. Whether your organization is large or small, the audit process can be disruptive if you’re not ready. From reviewing Microsoft license agreements to assessing cloud software licensing and gathering usage data, each step plays a critical role in ensuring compliance and minimizing financial exposure.  

Microsoft software audits are designed to verify that your organization is using its products as negotiated in your licensing terms. If discrepancies are found—whether due to over-deployment, misused entitlements, or poor documentation—your business could face penalties, forced purchases, or reputational damage.  

Proactive preparation helps you avoid these outcomes. It allows you to identify and resolve compliance gaps before they become audit findings. It also positions your organization as a responsible partner, which can lead to more favorable outcomes during the audit process.  

Reviewing Microsoft License Agreements: 

The first step in preparing for an audit is understanding your Microsoft license agreements. These contracts define how your organization can use Microsoft software, including limitations, entitlements, and renewal terms. Common agreements include: 

Enterprise Agreement (EA): Designed for large organizations with predictable software needs. 

Microsoft Products and Services Agreement (MPSA): Offers flexible purchasing across multiple product lines. 

Cloud Solution Provider (CSP): Ideal for businesses using Microsoft cloud services like Azure and Microsoft 365.  

Review each agreement carefully. Pay attention to license quantities, product use rights, and any clauses related to license mobility or hybrid environments. If your organization has undergone changes, such as mergers, acquisitions, or rapid growth, make sure your agreements reflect your current structure and usage.  

It’s also important to centralize license documentation. Keep records of all purchases, renewals, and amendments in a secure, accessible location. This will make it easier to respond to auditor requests and demonstrate compliance.  

Assessing Cloud Software Licensing: 

Cloud software licensing introduces a new layer of complexity to the audit process. Unlike traditional on-prem licenses, cloud entitlements are often subscription-based and tied to user identities or workloads. This makes tracking and managing licenses more challenging, especially in hybrid environments. 

Start by identifying all Microsoft cloud services your organization uses, such as Microsoft 365, Azure, and Dynamics 365. Review your subscription plans and entitlements. Make sure each user is assigned the correct license and that unused licenses are deactivated or reassigned. Pay special attention to license mobility rights, which allow certain licenses to be used across cloud and on-prem environments.  

If your organization uses third-party tools to manage cloud services, ensure they’re configured correctly and provide accurate reporting. Misconfigured tools can lead to false positives during an audit, resulting in unnecessary remediation.  

Gathering Software Usage Reporting Data: 

Accurate software usage reporting is essential for demonstrating compliance. Microsoft auditors will request detailed data about how software is deployed and used across your organization. This includes the number of installations, user access and activity, feature usage, and license assignments. 

To streamline this process, use automated tools like: 

• System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM): Tracks software deployment and usage. 

• Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit (MAP): Provides inventory and usage reports. 

• SolarWinds Service Desk: Offers audit-specific reporting features.  

These tools help you generate reliable data and reduce manual effort. They also allow you to identify anomalies before the audit begins, such as unauthorized installations or inactive licenses.  

Make sure your reporting tools are up to date and integrated with your license management systems. This ensures consistency across data sources and helps auditors validate your findings.  

Conducting an Internal Audit: 

Before the official audit begins, consider conducting an internal audit. This allows you to simulate the audit process, identify compliance gaps, and implement corrective actions. An internal audit should include: 

• Reviewing license agreements and documentation 

• Running usage reports and comparing them to entitlements 

• Identifying over-deployment or underutilization 

• Validating cloud license assignments 

• Documenting remediation steps 

Engage stakeholders from IT, procurement, and legal departments to ensure a comprehensive review. If possible, work with a licensing expert or consultant to validate your findings and provide guidance.  

An internal audit not only prepares you for the official review; it also builds confidence across your organization and demonstrates a commitment to compliance.  

Building a Cross-Functional Audit Team: 

Preparing for a Microsoft software audit is a team effort. It requires coordination across departments and clear communication with auditors. To manage the process effectively, establish a cross-functional audit team that includes IT administrators, procurement specialists, legal advisors, and compliance officers. 

Designate a primary point of contact to liaise with Microsoft auditors. This person should be knowledgeable about your software environment and authorized to make decisions. They’ll be responsible for gathering data, responding to requests, and coordinating internal efforts.  

Creating an Audit Response Plan: 

Even with thorough preparation, audits can be unpredictable. That’s why it’s important to create an audit response plan. This plan outlines how your organization will respond to auditor requests, address findings, and communicate internally. Key components of an audit response plan include: 

• Communication Protocols: Define how information will be shared with auditors and stakeholders. 

• Documentation Templates: Standardize how data and evidence are presented. 

• Escalation Procedures: Identify who will handle disputes or complex findings. 

• Remediation Workflows: Outline steps for resolving compliance issues. 

Having a response plan in place ensures that your organization can act quickly and confidently during the audit. It also helps maintain transparency and professionalism throughout the process.  

Developing a Software Procurement Strategy 

A well-defined software procurement strategy is essential for maintaining compliance, optimizing costs, and supporting long-term business growth. When it comes to Microsoft software license audits, your procurement practices can either protect your organization or expose it to unnecessary risks. By taking a strategic approach to software purchasing, you ensure that your licensing aligns with actual usage, avoids overprovisioning, and supports audit readiness. 

Why Strategic Procurement Matters: 

To buy licenses, you must be able to make informed decisions that support your company’s operational needs and compliance obligations. Without a clear strategy, organizations often end up with fragmented purchasing processes, inconsistent licensing, and poor visibility into software usage. These issues can lead to non-compliance during a Microsoft software audit and result in financial penalties or forced purchases. 

A strategic procurement approach helps your business: 

• Avoid under- or over-licensing 

• Maintain accurate records for audit purposes 

• Align software investments with business goals 

• Improve budgeting and forecasting 

• Strengthen vendor relationships 

By centralizing procurement and implementing standardized processes, your organization can reduce risk and improve efficiency across the board. 

Centralized Purchasing and Vendor Management: 

One of the most effective ways to improve your software procurement strategy is by centralizing purchasing decisions. When software is purchased through multiple departments or individuals, it becomes difficult to track entitlements and ensure consistency. Centralized procurement allows your organization to: 

Vendor management also plays a key role in strategic procurement. Establish strong relationships with authorized Microsoft resellers and CSPs to ensure you’re purchasing legitimate licenses and receiving accurate guidance. Work with vendors who understand your business needs and can help you navigate complex licensing models.  

Forecasting and Budgeting for Software Needs: 

Effective software procurement requires accurate forecasting and budgeting. This means anticipating future software needs based on business growth, technology changes, and user requirements. Consider factors like planned expansions, migration to cloud platforms, changes in software usage patterns, and regulatory updates. 

Use historical data and usage reports to inform your forecasts. Tools like SCCM and SolarWinds can help you track software deployment and identify trends. This data allows you to make informed purchasing decisions and avoid last-minute license acquisitions that can disrupt operations or inflate costs. 

Budgeting should also account for license renewals, upgrades, and support costs. Work with finance teams to create a software budget that aligns with your organization’s strategic goals and ensures funds are available when needed.  

Standardizing Procurement Workflows: 

To maintain consistency and control, standardize your software procurement workflows. This includes: 

• Creating a formal approval process for software purchases 

• Using purchase order systems to track transactions 

• Maintaining a centralized repository for license documentation 

• Implementing procurement policies that align with compliance requirements 

Standardized workflows reduce the risk of unauthorized purchases and ensure that all software acquisitions are properly documented. They also make it easier to respond to audit requests and demonstrate compliance with Microsoft license agreements. 

Leveraging Procurement to Support Audit Readiness: 

Your software procurement strategy should be closely tied to your audit readiness efforts. Every license purchase should be documented, validated, and aligned with actual usage. This means: 

• Matching license entitlements to deployment data 

• Ensuring that cloud subscriptions are properly assigned and managed 

• Keeping records of all purchases, renewals, and amendments 

During a Microsoft software audit, auditors will request proof of licensing for deployed software. A strong procurement strategy ensures that this documentation is readily available and accurate. It also helps your organization respond confidently to audit findings and avoid unnecessary penalties.  

Handling the Audit Process 

Once a Microsoft software license audit begins, your organization must be ready to respond quickly, accurately, and professionally. The audit process can be stressful, but with the right approach, it becomes an opportunity to demonstrate compliance and strengthen your software management practices. From communicating with auditors to responding to findings and finalizing outcomes, each step requires careful coordination and attention to detail.  

Communication with Microsoft Auditors: 

Clear and consistent communication is one of the most important aspects of managing a software audit. Microsoft or its designated auditors will request access to your software inventory, licensing documentation, and usage reports. How your organization responds to these requests can influence the tone and outcome of the audit. 

Start by designating a single point of contact to manage all communications. This person should be knowledgeable about your Microsoft license agreements, software deployment, and internal compliance policies. They’ll serve as the liaison between your organization and the audit team, ensuring that requests are handled promptly and accurately.  

Maintain a professional and cooperative tone throughout the process. Auditors are not adversaries. They’re there to verify compliance. Being transparent and responsive builds trust and can lead to more favorable outcomes. If you need clarification on a request or timeline, don’t hesitate to ask. Open dialogue helps prevent misunderstandings and keeps the audit on track.  

Responding to Preliminary Findings: 

After reviewing your data, auditors will present preliminary findings. These may include areas of non-compliance, discrepancies in license usage, or recommendations for corrective action. Your organization will have an opportunity to respond before the final report is issued.  

Take time to review the findings carefully. If you believe a finding is inaccurate, gather supporting documentation and provide context. For example, if a license appears to be missing, show proof of purchase or deployment records. If usage data seems inflated, explain how your reporting tools track activity and why the numbers may differ.  

It’s also helpful to involve legal or licensing experts during this phase. They can help interpret complex licensing terms and ensure your response is thorough and defensible. The goal is to resolve discrepancies collaboratively and demonstrate your commitment to compliance.  

Finalizing the Audit Outcome: 

Once your response has been reviewed, auditors will issue a final report. This document confirms the audit results and outlines any required actions. These may include: 

• Purchasing additional licenses to correct under-licensing 

• Adjusting license assignments or configurations 

• Implementing new compliance controls 

• Paying penalties or fees  

If your organization is found to be compliant, the audit will conclude with no further action. If remediation is required, Microsoft may offer a grace period to implement changes. Use this time to address issues thoroughly and prevent future non-compliance. 

After the audit is finalized, conduct a post-audit review with your internal team to discuss what went well, what could be improved, and how to strengthen your software management practices moving forward. Consider implementing a SAM program to maintain ongoing compliance and prepare for future audits.  

Building Long-Term Audit Resilience: 

Handling a Microsoft software audit effectively helps your business build resilience. By learning from each audit and improving your internal controls, your organization becomes better equipped to manage software licensing and respond to future reviews. 

Key strategies for long-term audit resilience include: 

• Maintaining accurate and centralized license documentation 

• Using automated tools for software usage reporting 

• Standardizing procurement and deployment workflows 

• Training staff on licensing policies and compliance requirements 

• Conducting regular internal audits to identify and resolve issues early 

These practices not only support audit readiness but also improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, and strengthen vendor relationships.  

Lessons Learned 

Completing a Microsoft software license audit offers more than just a compliance verdict—it provides valuable insights into your organization’s software management practices. Whether the outcome was favorable or required remediation, there are always lessons to be learned that can strengthen your licensing strategy and prepare your business for future audits.  

Common Pitfalls to Avoid: 

One of the most common issues identified during audits is inadequate documentation. Many organizations fail to maintain centralized records of license purchases, renewals, and usage. Without clear documentation, even compliant software deployments can appear non-compliant to auditors. To avoid this, businesses should implement a standardized system for tracking and storing license data.  

Another common pitfall is misunderstanding license entitlements. Microsoft license agreements can be complex, particularly when it comes to cloud software licensing or hybrid environments. Misinterpreting terms like license mobility or user-based subscriptions can lead to over-deployment or unauthorized usage. Regular training and consultation with licensing experts can help your team stay informed and avoid costly mistakes.  

Decentralized procurement is also a risk factor. When software is purchased across multiple departments without coordination, it becomes difficult to maintain consistency and control. This often results in duplicate purchases, unused licenses, and compliance gaps. Centralizing procurement and establishing clear approval workflows can mitigate these issues.  

Lastly, many organizations underestimate the importance of internal communication. During an audit, cross-functional collaboration is essential. IT, procurement, legal, and compliance teams must work together to gather data, interpret findings, and respond effectively. Lack of coordination can delay the audit process and lead to incomplete or inaccurate responses.  

Successful Audit Case Studies: 

Organizations that navigate audits successfully often share a few key traits. They maintain accurate and up-to-date license documentation, use automated tools for software usage reporting, and conduct regular internal audits to identify and resolve issues early.  

For example, a SAM manager at a mid-sized financial firm faced challenges managing her company’s overwhelming software portfolio. By partnering with an IT company, she discovered that just three software vendors accounted for 65% of the company’s software budget. This insight helped her prioritize SAM efforts and identify unused applications with the highest financial impact. Working with an IT team, she was able to remove non-essential software, streamlining the environment ahead of renewal negotiations and ensuring compliance readiness.  

License procurement and management is another critical step to ensure your business is compliant before a license audit. Tennessee Retina, a leading healthcare provider in Middle Tennessee, uncovered significant cost savings through a licensing optimization initiative. After experiencing email routing issues caused by overlapping anti-spam solutions, Plow Networks conducted a technology assessment and discovered that the organization already had antivirus and anti-spam capabilities included in existing Microsoft licenses. By eliminating redundant third-party licenses and streamlining its software environment, Tennessee Retina saved over $5,000 annually while improving security and operational efficiency.   

These case studies highlight the value of preparation, collaboration, and strategic planning. They show that audits don’t have to be disruptive to your environment and instead serve as a catalyst for operational improvement.  

Conclusion 

Facing a Microsoft software license audit doesn’t have to be a disruptive experience. With the right preparation, strategic procurement, and clear internal processes, your organization can navigate the audit confidently and emerge stronger. From understanding compliance audit procedures to leveraging software usage reporting tools, each step plays a vital role in protecting your business from risk and ensuring long-term licensing success. 

Audits are more than just a compliance checkpoint. They’re an opportunity to refine your software management practices, eliminate inefficiencies, and align your licensing strategy with business goals. Whether you’re reviewing Microsoft license agreements, assessing cloud software licensing, or developing a procurement strategy, proactive planning is key.  

If your organization hasn’t yet built an audit readiness plan, now is the time to start. Begin by centralizing your license documentation, implementing automated reporting tools, and conducting internal audits to identify gaps. Engage cross-functional teams to ensure alignment and designate a point of contact for future audit communications.  

Ready to take control of your software licensing strategy? Explore how partnering with a trusted partner like Plow Networks can streamline your environment and prepare your business for future audits. Don’t wait until your audit notice arrives. Start building your compliance foundation today.